Mar 30, 2010
It is hard to say which ones are better, but from the separation of concerns principle it is preffered MVC over of MVP. It is important how you think your architecture and especially what your application does.
Mar 10, 2010
Nirajan Singh has given a pretty decent reply, so rather than adding anything I will just present my viewpoint.
For WinForm app MVP is a better choice, especially considering testability.
Well as far as intelligent view is concerned, I will partially agree, as it's an open debate that where to put most of the logic. And considering testability, I think heavy use of the Presenter would be a better choice, but again, that's my opinion.
Feb 12, 2010
I am struggling with this a bit myself. From what I've read (not tried it yet) the impetus behind MVP was to "smarten up" the view. I believe in a pure MVC patten, we wouldn't want to take advantage of things on the client side like Data Binding or any type of data entry validation. With MVP, you get to use more of the richness provided by the platform.
I'd love to hear how you end up tackling this issue. I did find one website (don't have the link handy) that talked about using MVC / MVP in a WinForms world.